We sign these contracts too.
Why we built Clause
Clause is made by Automated Ltd, a small web agency in the UK. We sign client contracts for a living: master service agreements, statements of work, NDAs, the occasional 20-page framework nobody enjoys reading. We built the tool we wanted on our side of the table, one that reads the paper closely and tells you, in plain English, what is worth pushing back on.
We test it on our own paper
Every contract Automated Ltd signs is a chance to check Clause against reality. We run our own client agreements through it, compare its flags to what a careful read finds, and fix what it misses. It is dogfooding in the most literal sense: the tool reviews the contracts that pay our bills.
Honest by default
We don't invent testimonials, user counts or accuracy percentages, and we won't until they are real and measured. We tell you plainly what Clause catches and what it can't. It is a risk-triage tool, not a law firm, and it does not provide legal advice. For any decision that matters, a solicitor is still worth it.
Where we're headed
Clause is in early access, which means it is useful today and still rough at the edges. We're building the accuracy tests we'll publish openly, widening the playbook, and shaping the product around what early members tell us. If you sign contracts without a lawyer, we're building this for you.
Try it on a contract.
See the risk map on a sample, or run your own. Free during early access.